Passed
HR-1949-119
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 286.
Sponsored by August Pfluger (R-TX)
What it does
This bill would amend the Natural Gas Act to eliminate the existing requirement that the Department of Energy approve natural gas exports and imports as being in the "public interest." It would transfer exclusive siting and construction authority for LNG terminals to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and direct FERC to automatically deem all natural gas trade consistent with the public interest. The bill preserves the President's existing authority to restrict natural gas trade with sanctioned countries or state sponsors of terrorism.
Who benefits
U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters and producers who would face fewer regulatory hurdles and faster approvals. Energy companies seeking to build or expand LNG export terminals. Countries seeking to import U.S. natural gas, particularly U.S. allies in Europe and Asia seeking to diversify away from Russian or other suppliers. Domestic natural gas drillers who could access larger global markets. Investors and shareholders in the LNG sector. Communities near new LNG infrastructure that may gain construction and operational jobs.
Who is hurt
Domestic industrial and residential natural gas consumers who may face higher prices if more supply is exported abroad. Environmental and community groups near LNG terminals who currently use the public interest review process to raise concerns about local impacts. Competing energy sources (renewables, nuclear) that may face a more entrenched fossil fuel market. Domestic manufacturers that rely on low-cost natural gas as a feedstock or fuel input. Federal agency staff whose review authority would be eliminated. Countries currently supplying natural gas to U.S. allies who would face increased U.S. competition.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that the current DOE public interest review process creates lengthy, unpredictable delays that undermine U.S. competitiveness in global LNG markets — a sector where the U.S. became the world's largest LNG exporter in 2023. They contend that eliminating the approval bottleneck would allow allies in Europe and Asia to secure long-term U.S. energy contracts, reducing dependence on adversarial suppliers like Russia, and that FERC's existing environmental and safety review under the National Environmental Policy Act provides sufficient oversight without a redundant public interest test.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that removing the public interest standard eliminates the primary mechanism for weighing domestic energy affordability, environmental impacts, and national security considerations before approving large-scale export commitments. They contend that increased LNG exports have been linked to higher domestic natural gas prices, citing Energy Information Administration data showing price sensitivity to export volumes, and that FERC's siting review does not substitute for a broader economic and policy assessment of whether a given export project serves the national interest.
Constitutional context
Congress has broad authority to regulate international commerce under the Commerce Clause (Art. I, §8, cl. 3), which clearly covers natural gas imports and exports. The bill's delegation of exclusive authority to FERC — with a statutory directive to deem all trade in the public interest — raises questions under the post-Loper Bright framework, as courts will independently assess whether FERC's resulting decisions are consistent with the Natural Gas Act's remaining provisions rather than deferring to the agency's interpretation.
Checks and balances
The executive branch (FERC) gains streamlined, exclusive authority over LNG terminal approvals, while Congress eliminates the DOE's public interest gatekeeping role; the President retains authority to restrict trade with sanctioned nations, and courts retain review of FERC decisions under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Historical precedent
The DOE placed a pause on new LNG export approvals in January 2024 to conduct a public interest review update, which prompted significant industry and legislative pushback and directly preceded this legislative effort to remove the approval requirement entirely.
Passed