HR-2001-119
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 626.
Sponsored by Robin Kelly (D-IL)
What it does
This bill would reauthorize a federal grant program under Section 340G of the Public Health Service Act that addresses dental workforce shortages. It would increase the authorized funding level from $13,903,000 to $15,000,000 per year and extend the program for fiscal years 2026 through 2030. Funds would remain available until expended, meaning unspent money would not automatically lapse at the end of each fiscal year.
Who benefits
Patients in underserved communities — particularly rural areas and low-income urban neighborhoods — who lack access to dental care. Community health centers and safety-net dental clinics that receive grant funding. Dental students and recent graduates who may receive training support or loan repayment through the program. State and local health departments that administer dental workforce programs. Dental hygienists and other mid-level dental providers whose workforce development may be supported by the grants.
Who is hurt
Private dental practices that compete with grant-subsidized clinics for patients and dental professionals. Taxpayers who bear the cost of the increased appropriation. Other public health programs that compete for discretionary funding within the same budget. Dental workforce programs not covered under Section 340G that may receive comparatively less attention or funding.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that approximately 68 million Americans live in dental health professional shortage areas, and that the existing grant program has a demonstrated track record of expanding access in communities where private dental markets have failed to meet demand. They contend that the modest funding increase — roughly $1.1 million per year above the prior authorization — is a cost-effective way to address a documented public health gap, and that the "remain available until expended" provision ensures funds are not wasted due to administrative timing delays.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that reauthorizing and increasing a federal grant program does not address the structural barriers — such as low Medicaid reimbursement rates for dental services — that drive workforce shortages in the first place, and that the program's impact relative to its cost has not been rigorously evaluated. They contend that federal grant programs can create dependency among recipient clinics without producing lasting, self-sustaining workforce solutions, and that the funding would be better directed toward Medicaid dental reimbursement increases or state-level workforce initiatives with stronger accountability measures.