Passed
211 Yea206 Nay16 Not voting1/2 required
HR-276-119
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 73.
Sponsored by Marjorie Greene (R-GA)
What it does
This bill would officially rename the Gulf of Mexico to the "Gulf of America" in all U.S. federal law, maps, regulations, and documents. It would direct the Secretary of the Interior, through the Board on Geographic Names, to oversee the change. All federal agencies would be required to update their documents and maps within 180 days of enactment.
Who benefits
Federal agencies and contractors that produce official U.S. maps and geographic publications would receive clear legal direction on nomenclature. Domestic industries that use federal geographic designations — such as offshore energy companies, federal fisheries managers, and Coast Guard operations — would have a uniform federal name to reference. Supporters of the name change as a matter of national identity or branding would see their preferred terminology codified in law.
Who is hurt
Federal agencies would bear administrative costs of updating maps, documents, and databases within the 180-day window. U.S. businesses, academic institutions, and publishers that use the name "Gulf of Mexico" in their materials may face pressure or confusion to align with the new federal designation. International partners — including Mexico and Cuba, which border the same body of water and use the name "Gulf of Mexico" — would not be bound by this law, potentially creating inconsistency in cross-border communications, shipping, and diplomatic documents. Cartographers, textbook publishers, and geographic information system (GIS) vendors may incur update costs.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that the United States has sovereign authority over its own official geographic nomenclature and that the Board on Geographic Names has historically updated place names to reflect national identity and policy priorities. They contend that the Gulf is a critical economic zone for the U.S. — home to roughly 17% of domestic oil production and major commercial fisheries — and that an American-identified name better reflects U.S. stewardship and economic interest in the region.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the Gulf of Mexico is an internationally recognized geographic name used by the United Nations, neighboring nations, and global shipping and aviation authorities, and that a unilateral U.S. renaming creates practical confusion in cross-border trade, navigation, and diplomacy without changing any underlying policy. They contend that the administrative burden placed on federal agencies — updating thousands of maps, legal documents, and databases within 180 days — represents a real cost with no corresponding functional benefit to governance or the public.
Passed