HR-3100-119
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsored by Russell Fry (R-SC)
What it does
This bill would amend the National Child Protection Act of 1993 to allow businesses and organizations that serve vulnerable populations (such as children, the elderly, or people with disabilities) to request criminal background checks on two additional categories of individuals: (1) contractors who work with those populations on behalf of the organization, and (2) individuals that the organization licenses or certifies to provide care for those populations. Currently, the Act primarily covers employees; this bill would extend that background check access to non-employee workers and certified caregivers.
Who benefits
Children, elderly individuals, people with disabilities, and other vulnerable populations who may be better protected from individuals with relevant criminal histories. Nonprofit organizations, schools, healthcare facilities, and other service providers that use contractors rather than direct employees — they would gain a legal pathway to screen these workers. Licensing and certification bodies that currently lack clear authority to request background checks on those they certify. Parents and family members of vulnerable individuals who rely on certified or contracted caregivers. Staffing agencies that place workers with organizations serving vulnerable populations may benefit from clearer legal standards.
Who is hurt
Contractors and gig workers in caregiving or child-serving roles who would be subject to new background check scrutiny, potentially limiting employment opportunities — particularly those with older or minor criminal records. Individuals who have been licensed or certified to provide care and who may face disqualification or delays. Small businesses and sole proprietors who contract with organizations serving vulnerable populations and may face administrative burdens. People with criminal records who work in caregiving fields, including those who have completed their sentences, may face increased barriers to employment. Organizations may bear additional administrative costs to process or coordinate background checks.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that the existing gap in the National Child Protection Act — which covers employees but not contractors or certified caregivers — creates a loophole that bad actors can exploit by working through staffing arrangements rather than direct employment. They contend that as the caregiving economy has shifted toward contract and gig-based work, the law has failed to keep pace, leaving vulnerable populations exposed. Extending background check access to these categories, they argue, is a targeted, low-cost protective measure that gives organizations the tools they need without mandating new federal requirements.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that expanding background check access to contractors and certified caregivers could entrench employment barriers for people who have already served their sentences, disproportionately affecting communities of color who face higher rates of criminal justice involvement. They contend that background checks are an imperfect screening tool — they do not predict future behavior and can flag arrests without convictions — and that broader access may lead to over-exclusion of qualified workers in an already understaffed caregiving sector. Critics may also raise concerns about data privacy and the potential for misuse of criminal history information by private organizations with limited oversight.