Passed
233 Yea190 Nay10 Not voting1/2 required
HR-5107-119
Received in the Senate.
Sponsored by Andrew Clyde (R-GA)
What it does
This bill would repeal the District of Columbia's Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. Law 24-345), which was enacted by the DC Council. The repeal would restore all prior DC law that the 2022 Act had amended or repealed, as if the 2022 Act had never been enacted. Two portions of the 2022 Act would be preserved: provisions related to a police accountability office (subtitle S) and body-worn camera and early warning system provisions (subtitle A).
Who benefits
Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officers who would regain authorities or protections that the 2022 Act restricted. Police unions and law enforcement advocacy groups. Residents and businesses who believe the 2022 Act weakened public safety tools. Victims of crime who may benefit if restored police powers lead to increased enforcement. Federal officials who oversee DC under Congress's constitutional authority over the District.
Who is hurt
DC residents who supported the 2022 reforms and would lose those protections. Civil liberties and police accountability advocates. Individuals who may be subject to policing practices that the 2022 Act had restricted or regulated. The DC Council and DC government, whose locally enacted law would be overridden by Congress. DC residents broadly, who have no voting representation in Congress to contest the override. Community organizations that worked to pass the 2022 reforms at the local level.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that DC's crime rates rose following the 2022 Act and that the reforms tied officers' hands in ways that undermined public safety in the nation's capital. They contend that Congress has a unique constitutional responsibility for the District under Article I and that overriding a local law that has produced measurable public safety concerns is a legitimate exercise of that authority, particularly given that DC is the seat of the federal government.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the 2022 Act was the product of extensive local deliberation and democratic input from DC residents, and that congressional repeal overrides the will of the community most directly affected. They contend that the causal link between the 2022 reforms and crime trends is not established, and that eliminating accountability measures — while preserving only narrow exceptions — removes oversight tools that protect residents from police misconduct.
Passed