HR-6529-119
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Sponsored by Greg Landsman (D-OH)
What it does
This bill would require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to hold a technical conference within 90 days of enactment, bringing together representatives from the Department of Energy, public utilities, transmission providers, state regulators, ratepayer advocates, and large electricity users including AI data centers. The conference would focus on strategies and rate structures to protect residential and small commercial customers from electricity cost increases caused by large industrial power users. FERC would then be required to submit a report with recommendations and best practices to Congress within 180 days of the conference's conclusion.
Who benefits
Residential electricity customers and small commercial businesses who may face higher utility bills due to large load growth from data centers. Ratepayer advocacy organizations that would gain a formal seat at the table in a federal proceeding. State utility regulators seeking federal guidance on rate-setting. Rural and lower-income households, who spend a higher share of income on electricity and would be most affected by rate increases. Renewable energy developers, who may benefit if the conference recommends new infrastructure investment tied to large load growth.
Who is hurt
AI and technology companies operating large data centers, who could face increased regulatory scrutiny and potentially less favorable rate structures as a result of the conference's recommendations. Utilities that currently benefit from large industrial customers as anchor loads may face pressure to restructure rates. Data center developers and investors who could face uncertainty if new cost-allocation rules emerge from the process. Jurisdictions competing to attract data center investment may lose economic development leverage if federal rate guidance discourages favorable local utility agreements.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that AI data centers are among the fastest-growing sources of electricity demand in the U.S. — the Department of Energy projects data center power consumption could double or triple by 2028 — and that without deliberate rate-setting policy, ordinary households and small businesses will subsidize the grid upgrades required to serve these large industrial users. They contend that a FERC-led conference is a measured, evidence-based first step that gathers all stakeholders before any binding rules are imposed, ensuring that cost-allocation decisions are informed by technical expertise rather than ad hoc utility decisions.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that FERC already has broad authority to review utility rate structures and that mandating a specific conference on a single category of load growth is unnecessary federal intervention in a process states and utilities are already managing. They contend that singling out AI data centers — which create jobs, generate tax revenue, and support grid investment — could deter a high-growth industry and that the bill's framing presupposes data centers are causing cost harm before any evidence has been formally established through FERC's existing rulemaking processes.