HR-7893-119
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 635.
Sponsored by Tim Walberg (R-MI)
What it does
This bill would amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the Secretary of Education, working with the Social Security Administration (SSA), to verify the Social Security number and citizenship status of every individual who applies for federal student aid under the FAFSA process. The bill adds a "notwithstanding any other provision of law" clause, which would override conflicting requirements in other statutes. It would apply to aid applications submitted under sections 483, 484(a), and 494 of the Higher Education Act.
Who benefits
Taxpayers broadly, if the verification process reduces improper payments of federal student aid to ineligible recipients. Eligible U.S. citizens and qualifying non-citizens who apply for aid, if a more systematic verification process reduces processing errors or fraud that could otherwise affect program integrity. The Social Security Administration, which gains a formal cooperative role in the verification process. Institutions of higher education that rely on accurate federal aid determinations for their students.
Who is hurt
FAFSA applicants whose Social Security records contain errors or discrepancies — including victims of identity theft, individuals with name changes, or those with data mismatches between Education Department and SSA records — who could face delays or denials. Students from mixed-status families, who may face additional scrutiny even if they themselves are eligible. Administrative staff at colleges and universities who may need to handle a higher volume of verification-related inquiries. The Department of Education and SSA, which would bear implementation and coordination costs.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that federal student aid represents tens of billions of dollars in annual spending and that robust verification of Social Security numbers and citizenship status is a basic program integrity measure. They contend that the existing verification framework has gaps — the "notwithstanding" clause is designed to remove legal ambiguities that may have previously limited the Education Department's ability to cross-check applicant data with SSA records — and that ensuring only eligible individuals receive aid protects the program's long-term fiscal sustainability and fairness to qualifying students.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the existing FAFSA verification system already screens for eligibility and that adding a mandatory SSA cross-check layer could create bureaucratic bottlenecks that delay or deny aid to eligible students — particularly those with data discrepancies due to SSA record errors, which disproportionately affect low-income and minority applicants. They contend that the broad "notwithstanding any other provision of law" language could override privacy protections under FERPA or other statutes, and that the bill's practical effect may be to create barriers for eligible students rather than to meaningfully reduce fraud.