HR-8071-119
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Sponsored by Al Green (D-TX)
What it does
This bill would amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 to require the Defense Production Act Committee to conduct a discussion-based simulation — commonly called a "tabletop exercise" — at least once every five years. The exercise would assess what resources are needed and how best to use the committee's authorities under Titles I and III of the Act. The bill also makes a minor technical correction to the Act's short title punctuation.
Who benefits
Federal agencies that sit on the Defense Production Act Committee, who would gain a structured, recurring process to identify gaps in industrial mobilization readiness. Defense contractors and domestic manufacturers in critical supply chains, who may benefit from better-coordinated government preparedness planning. The general public, to the extent improved readiness reduces disruption during national emergencies or supply chain crises.
Who is hurt
Federal agencies and committee members who would bear the administrative burden of organizing and participating in mandatory exercises every five years. Taxpayers would bear any costs associated with conducting the exercises, though those costs are likely modest. No private sector entities face direct regulatory burdens from this bill.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that the Defense Production Act grants the federal government sweeping authorities to direct industrial production during emergencies, yet the committee overseeing those authorities has no standing requirement to rehearse their use. They contend that tabletop exercises are a proven, low-cost preparedness tool — widely used in emergency management — and that requiring them every five years ensures the government does not discover coordination gaps only after a crisis has begun, as occurred during early COVID-19 supply chain disruptions.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that mandating a specific exercise format in statute is unnecessarily rigid and that the Defense Production Act Committee already has discretion to conduct preparedness activities as it sees fit. They contend that a statutory five-year requirement may create a compliance checkbox mentality — where agencies treat the exercise as a bureaucratic obligation rather than a genuine readiness tool — and that resources would be better directed toward actual supply chain investments than recurring planning simulations.