HR-835-119
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Sponsored by Nick LaLota (R-NY)
What it does
This bill would authorize a one-time federal grant of between $5 million and $10 million to the nonprofit organization that operates the National September 11 Memorial & Museum in New York City. The grant, administered by the Department of Homeland Security, would be used exclusively for the museum's operations, security, and maintenance. As a condition of receiving the grant, the museum would be required to provide free admission to active and retired military members, registered 9/11 first responders, and victims' family members; offer free public admission hours at least once per week; and submit to annual federal financial audits made available to the public.
Who benefits
The National September 11 Memorial & Museum Foundation, which would receive direct funding for operations and security. Active and retired military members, registered 9/11 first responders, and family members of victims, who would receive guaranteed free admission. Economically disadvantaged visitors, who are explicitly prioritized in the grant criteria. General public visitors, who would gain access to at least one free admission period per week. Taxpayers broadly, through the public financial audit requirement that increases accountability for how grant funds are spent.
Who is hurt
Taxpayers who fund the grant and may object to federal dollars supporting a single private nonprofit institution. Other memorial or museum organizations that do not receive similar federal support and may view this as preferential treatment. Visitors who currently pay full admission and may see no change in their experience. The museum itself could face administrative burden from mandatory annual federal audits and reporting requirements. Competing grant applicants within DHS's Office of the Secretary and Executive Management, whose funding pool this grant would draw from.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that the 9/11 Memorial & Museum serves a unique national interest — preserving the history of the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil and honoring nearly 3,000 victims — that justifies a one-time federal contribution. They contend the bill's conditions, including free admission for first responders and military personnel and mandatory public financial audits, ensure accountability and broaden public access, particularly for economically disadvantaged visitors who might otherwise be priced out of a site of profound national significance.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the museum is a private 501(c)(3) nonprofit that already generates substantial revenue through ticket sales, charitable donations, and existing grants, and that a federal subsidy sets a problematic precedent for directing public funds to a single private institution. They contend that if Congress wishes to support 9/11 commemoration, it should do so through the National Park Service or another established federal framework, rather than creating a one-off grant mechanism that bypasses competitive allocation processes and could invite similar requests from other memorial organizations.