HR-8491-119
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Sponsored by Hillary Scholten (D-MI)
What it does
This bill would require the Postmaster General to conduct a feasibility study, within one year of enactment, on whether the U.S. Postal Service could use its existing Informed Delivery platform to send electronic notifications to customers about weather-related mail delays, post office closures, and requests to clear walkways and mailboxes. The Postmaster General would then submit a report to two congressional committees. After the report is submitted, the Postal Service would be permitted — but not required — to launch such a notification program, and the bill explicitly allows the program to operate notwithstanding the Privacy Act of 1974.
Who benefits
USPS customers enrolled in the Informed Delivery platform who would receive advance notice of weather-related delays. Elderly, disabled, or homebound residents who rely heavily on mail delivery and may have difficulty monitoring closures through other channels. Rural residents in areas with limited local news coverage of postal disruptions. Mail carriers who may benefit if more customers clear walkways and mailboxes before delivery. Property and casualty insurers who could see fewer slip-and-fall claims if walkway-clearing reminders are effective.
Who is hurt
USPS, which would bear the administrative cost of conducting the study and potentially building out expanded notification infrastructure. Taxpayers who fund USPS operations to the extent implementation costs are not offset. Privacy advocates and customers concerned about expanded use of personal contact information held by USPS, given the bill's explicit Privacy Act waiver. Customers not enrolled in Informed Delivery — including those without internet access or email — who would not receive notifications and could be left at a relative disadvantage in awareness.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that USPS already collects customer contact information through the Informed Delivery platform and that leveraging this existing infrastructure to send weather alerts would be a low-cost, high-value public service. They contend that weather-related mail disruptions affect millions of customers annually and that proactive notifications could reduce missed deliveries, prevent injuries from uncleared walkways, and improve public trust in the Postal Service — all without mandating a new program, since the bill only requires a study before any action is taken.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the bill's explicit carve-out from the Privacy Act of 1974 sets a concerning precedent by allowing USPS to use customers' personal contact information — including phone numbers and email addresses — for purposes beyond what customers originally consented to. They contend that the study requirement may be an unnecessary use of USPS resources at a time when the agency faces significant financial pressures, and that private weather services and local media already provide this information freely, making a federal notification program duplicative.