HR-8720-119
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 651.
Sponsored by Bryan Steil (R-WI)
What it does
This bill would require political committees to collect a credit or debit card's verification code (CVV) and billing ZIP code for online contributions, and to verify donors without a U.S. mailing address using passports or immigration documents. It would ban contributions made with gift cards or store gift cards, require the cardholder's name to match the donor's name, remove the $200 reporting threshold so all contributions must be itemized regardless of size, and add a prohibition on knowingly helping someone make a contribution in another person's name. The Federal Election Commission would have 90 days after enactment to issue implementing regulations, with the new rules taking effect 90 days after that.
Who benefits
Donors and the public who would gain more complete contribution records, since all contributions—not just those over $200—would be itemized and reported; election-integrity advocates and researchers who track small-dollar donor networks; campaigns seeking to demonstrate compliance and reduce fraudulent or foreign-sourced online donations; credit card networks and processors consulted on implementation.
Who is hurt
Small-dollar donors, who would lose the privacy previously afforded to contributions under $200 and must now provide CVV codes and possibly copies of identification documents for online giving; U.S. citizens living abroad or without a standard U.S. mailing address, who face added documentation burdens; political committees and treasurers, who would bear new compliance, verification, and record-keeping costs and refund obligations; smaller campaigns and grassroots fundraising platforms with fewer resources to build compliant payment systems.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that removing the $200 reporting threshold and requiring CVV verification closes loopholes that have allowed fraudulent, foreign, or straw-donor contributions to flow into federal campaigns undetected, since sub-$200 donations previously escaped itemized disclosure entirely. They contend that banning gift-card contributions and requiring the cardholder's name to match the donor's name directly targets known methods of disguising the true source of a contribution, strengthening public confidence in campaign finance reporting.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that eliminating the $200 disclosure threshold exposes small-dollar donors' names, addresses, and contribution amounts to public disclosure for the first time, which could deter grassroots giving and expose modest donors to harassment for supporting unpopular causes. They contend that requiring passport copies or immigration documents from donors without conventional mailing addresses, and CVV verification for every online gift, creates compliance burdens that fall hardest on small campaigns and volunteer-run committees with limited administrative capacity.