HR-8826-119
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Sponsored by Mary Miller (R-IL)
What it does
This bill would require the Administrator of General Services to inscribe or display the national motto, "In God We Trust," in a prominent place on every federal public building. The Administrator would have one year from the date of enactment to comply. The bill applies to all public buildings as defined under federal property law (40 U.S.C. § 3301(a)).
Who benefits
Advocates of public religious expression who support visible displays of the national motto on government property. Contractors and vendors in signage, engraving, and construction trades who would be hired to fabricate and install the displays. Members of the public who visit federal buildings and support the motto's display.
Who is hurt
Taxpayers who would bear the cost of fabricating and installing displays across the federal building inventory, which includes thousands of structures. Non-religious Americans, atheists, agnostics, and members of minority religious traditions who may feel excluded or alienated by a theistic motto displayed on government property. General Services Administration staff who would bear the administrative burden of implementation and compliance tracking.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that "In God We Trust" has been the official national motto since 1956 and already appears on U.S. currency, making its display on federal buildings a straightforward affirmation of existing law rather than a new religious statement. They contend that courts have consistently upheld the motto as a form of ceremonial deism — a patriotic and historical expression that does not constitute government endorsement of religion under the Establishment Clause, citing cases such as Aronow v. United States (9th Cir. 1970).
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that mandating a theistic motto on every federal building goes beyond passive historical acknowledgment and amounts to a government-sponsored religious message displayed in the most prominent spaces of civic life. They contend that the Supreme Court's Establishment Clause jurisprudence has grown more context-sensitive in recent years, and that a sweeping, mandatory display requirement across all federal buildings could invite legal challenges under the principle that government must not appear to endorse religion, particularly for non-Christian and non-religious Americans who interact with these buildings daily.