HR-8949-119
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by James Walkinshaw (D-VA)
What it does
This bill would amend federal law to include certain overtime pay — specifically, Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime — received by U.S. Capitol Police officers in the calculation of their retirement annuities. The overtime counted toward retirement would be capped at 50% of the annual statutory overtime maximum set for U.S. Customs officers. Officers must have completed at least 15 years of service for the overtime to count toward a standard retirement annuity, though it would count toward disability annuities and survivor annuities regardless of years of service.
Who benefits
Current and future U.S. Capitol Police officers who work FLSA overtime and have at least 15 years of service would receive higher retirement annuities. Survivors and dependents of Capitol Police officers who die before retirement would benefit through improved survivor annuity calculations. Officers who become disabled before completing 15 years would also benefit, as overtime counts toward disability annuities without the service threshold. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) gains clearer statutory guidance for annuity calculations.
Who is hurt
The U.S. Treasury and federal taxpayers would bear higher costs, as larger annuities increase the long-term liability of the federal retirement system. The Capitol Police itself may face higher normal-cost contributions to the retirement fund. Newer officers with fewer than 15 years of service would not see their overtime count toward standard retirement annuities, creating a two-tier effect within the force. Other federal law enforcement agencies not covered by this bill may perceive an inequity relative to Capitol Police.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that Capitol Police officers routinely work mandatory FLSA overtime — particularly during high-security events, congressional sessions, and emergencies — yet that overtime is currently excluded from retirement calculations, effectively penalizing officers for work they are required to perform. They contend this creates a structural inequity compared to other federal law enforcement personnel whose overtime may already factor into compensation structures, and that correcting it is a straightforward matter of ensuring retirement benefits reflect actual career earnings and service demands.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that including overtime in retirement base pay calculations sets a precedent that could increase long-term federal pension liabilities, since annuities are paid for life and compounded over decades. They contend that overtime pay is by definition variable and non-guaranteed, and that basing permanent retirement benefits on it inflates annuities beyond what the underlying salary structure was designed to support — a concern that could extend to other federal agencies seeking similar treatment if this bill becomes law.