HR-9640-119
Subcommittee Hearings Held
Sponsored by Robert Wittman (R-VA)
What it does
This bill would reauthorize the Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI), a U.S. Geological Survey program that maps critical mineral and subsurface resources, providing $84,000,000 in funding for fiscal years 2027 through 2031. It would also expand the types of data the program can use, including advanced geophysical and geochemical sensing methods, and would integrate the USGS 3D Hydrography Program as an additional data source.
Who benefits
The U.S. Geological Survey and its mapping contractors; mining and critical minerals companies that use the data to locate deposits; geothermal and natural hydrogen energy developers; state geological surveys that partner on mapping projects; and downstream manufacturers dependent on domestic critical mineral supply chains.
Who is hurt
No group is meaningfully harmed by the program itself; taxpayers bear the modest cost of the $84 million appropriation over five years. Landowners in areas newly targeted for mineral exploration based on the mapping data could face increased interest in access or development on or near their property, though this bill does not itself authorize any land access or mining activity.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that reliable geological data on critical minerals is essential for reducing U.S. dependence on foreign supply chains, particularly from China, for materials used in batteries, defense systems, and electronics. They contend that modernizing the program with advanced sensing and geochemical methods, and integrating hydrography data, would produce more accurate and useful maps at modest additional cost of under $17 million annually.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that continually expanding federal mapping programs without a sunset review risks becoming a permanent subsidy for the mining industry funded by general taxpayers rather than resource users. They contend that Congress should require stronger cost-benefit reporting before extending funding, since prior appropriations for similar geological surveys have not always been matched by measurable increases in domestic mineral production.