Passed
HRES-5-119
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Sponsored by Michelle Fischbach (R-MN)
What it does
This resolution adopts the operating rules for the House of Representatives for the 119th Congress (2025–2026). It makes changes to standing rules covering how the House conducts floor votes, committee procedures, spending oversight, and member conduct. It also fast-tracks 12 separate bills for immediate floor consideration on topics including immigration, athletics eligibility, abortion survivor care, voter registration, and hydraulic fracturing.
Who benefits
The majority party (Republicans), who gain procedural advantages including a higher threshold to remove the Speaker, reserved bill numbers, and restored Holman Rule spending-cut authority. House members broadly benefit from electronic committee voting, remote witness testimony, and AI-assisted legislative tools. House employees gain mandatory anti-harassment policies, clearer non-disclosure agreement protections, and posted rights notices. Taxpayers gain expanded long-term spending point-of-order protections and inflation impact disclosures on major legislation. States, local governments, and tribal entities benefit from federal land conveyance scoring rules. The 12 fast-tracked bills, if passed, would benefit law enforcement, immigration enforcement advocates, and others depending on the specific bill.
Who is hurt
The minority party (Democrats) faces a higher bar to force a Speaker vacancy vote, requiring 9 majority-party members rather than any single member. Former members who are registered lobbyists or foreign agents lose access to House exercise facilities. The Office of Diversity and Inclusion is eliminated, affecting its staff and any members or employees who relied on its services. Regulations adopted under H. Res. 1096 (117th Congress) are voided. Executive branch witnesses lose the option of remote testimony. The 12 fast-tracked bills, if passed, could negatively affect unauthorized immigrants, sanctuary jurisdictions, and others depending on the specific bill.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that the rules package strengthens fiscal discipline by reinstating the Holman Rule — which allows appropriations amendments to cut specific federal salaries and positions — and by creating long-term spending points of order that block legislation adding more than $2.5 billion in direct spending over any 10-year window beyond the budget horizon. They contend the package improves transparency through mandatory anti-harassment policies, NDA reform, and expanded public access to legislative documents in machine-readable formats. They also argue that raising the Speaker-removal threshold from one member to nine prevents destabilizing procedural tactics that disrupted House operations in the prior Congress.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the Speaker-removal threshold change insulates House leadership from accountability by making it significantly harder for members — including those in the majority — to respond to leadership failures or misconduct. They contend that eliminating the Office of Diversity and Inclusion and voiding prior-Congress workplace regulations rolls back institutional protections for House employees without a demonstrated policy rationale. They also argue that fast-tracking 12 substantive bills under a rules resolution — bypassing normal committee markup and debate — circumvents the deliberative process that the rules package elsewhere claims to protect, concentrating scheduling power in majority leadership.
Passed
Failed
Passed