S-1005-119
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 119-237.
Sponsored by Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV)
What it does
This bill would transfer roughly 48,000 acres of federal land into trust for the Moapa Band of Paiutes and Las Vegas Paiute Tribe, adjust boundaries of the Red Rock Canyon and Sloan Canyon conservation areas, revoke and replace the Ivanpah Area of Critical Environmental Concern with nine new special management areas, designate roughly 2.5 million acres of new wilderness, and convey various federal parcels to Clark County, Boulder City, Mesquite, North Las Vegas, and the Moapa Valley Water District for public safety, water, and economic development purposes. It also amends the Clark County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan process, grants rights-of-way for water and transmission infrastructure, and renames a mountain peak.
Who benefits
The Moapa Band of Paiutes and Las Vegas Paiute Tribe, who gain expanded reservation land and associated economic development potential; Clark County and its municipalities (Boulder City, Mesquite, North Las Vegas), which receive land for public safety, water infrastructure, and economic development; the Moapa Valley Water District and Southern Nevada Water Authority, which gain rights-of-way for water infrastructure; conservation groups benefiting from new wilderness and species-protection area designations; and developers who may benefit from expanded land-disposal boundaries and expedited affordable-housing reviews.
Who is hurt
Off-highway vehicle users and mining or geothermal interests losing access to newly withdrawn wilderness and special management areas; ranchers or others with grazing or resource interests in areas converted to protective status; residents near the Job Creation Zone in Sloan who may be affected by future nonresidential development; and federal taxpayers who bear survey, management-plan, and administrative implementation costs, though most conveyances are made without monetary consideration so there is little direct revenue effect either way.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue the bill balances economic growth and conservation by expanding tribal sovereignty and land bases, protecting nearly 2.5 million acres of desert habitat and wilderness, and giving fast-growing Clark County communities land for public safety facilities, water infrastructure, and job creation. They contend it reflects years of local negotiation among tribes, county officials, and conservation groups, following the successful model of the 1998 Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue the bill locks up large areas of public land from mining, energy development, and off-road recreation without adequate independent environmental review, and that broad discretion given to the Secretary over reversion and management-plan timelines could delay accountability. They contend that consolidating so many disparate land transactions into one bill limits focused congressional scrutiny of any single provision's costs or environmental tradeoffs.