S-1441-119
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 342.
Sponsored by Thomas Tillis (R-NC)
What it does
This bill would require the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to establish a five-year pilot grant program for nonprofit organizations that provide service dogs to veterans with qualifying disabilities, conditions, or diagnoses such as visual impairments. The VA could award up to $2 million per nonprofit per fiscal year on a competitive basis. The VA would also be required to provide veterinary insurance coverage to veterans who receive a service dog through the program.
Who benefits
Veterans with qualifying disabilities — including visual impairments and other eligible conditions — who need but cannot afford service dogs. Nonprofit organizations that train and place service dogs, which would gain access to federal grant funding. Veterinarians and pet insurance providers who may see increased demand. Indirectly, family members and caregivers of veterans who may benefit from reduced caregiving burdens if veterans gain greater independence through service dogs.
Who is hurt
Taxpayers who bear the cost of the program. Nonprofit service dog organizations that do not win competitive grants, which may face a disadvantage relative to better-resourced competitors. Veterans with disabilities not covered under the program's qualifying criteria, who would be excluded. For-profit service dog providers, who are ineligible for grants under the program's nonprofit-only structure.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that service dogs provide documented therapeutic and functional benefits for veterans with disabilities — including those with PTSD, visual impairments, and mobility limitations — and that the cost of a trained service dog (often $20,000–$65,000) places them out of reach for many veterans. They contend that a competitive, nonprofit-based grant model is a cost-effective way to expand access, and that the VA's existing service dog benefit covers only certain disability categories, leaving a meaningful gap this pilot would address.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that the VA already operates a service dog benefits program and that adding a parallel pilot grant structure risks duplicating existing infrastructure, fragmenting oversight, and diverting resources without clear evidence of improved outcomes. They contend that capping grants at $2 million per nonprofit per year without requiring rigorous outcome metrics or cost-per-placement benchmarks may result in inefficient spending, and that a five-year pilot without defined success criteria could be difficult to evaluate or sunset as intended.