S-4828-119
Held at the desk.
Sponsored by Eric Schmitt (R-MO)
What it does
This bill formally reaffirms and re-adopts the Declaration of Independence as an "Organic Law" of the United States — a category of foundational legal documents that also includes the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution, and the Northwest Ordinance. It sets forth the full text of the Declaration in the legislative record and states that Congress recognizes it as the enduring charter of American independence, national sovereignty, natural rights, equal citizenship, and government by consent. The bill was passed by the Senate unanimously on June 18, 2026, in commemoration of the 250th anniversary of American independence.
Who benefits
All Americans symbolically, as the bill reaffirms foundational national principles. Scholars, educators, and legal advocates who argue the Declaration's principles should inform constitutional interpretation may benefit from the added congressional weight given to the document. Those who favor natural rights or consent-of-the-governed frameworks in legal and political arguments may find the reaffirmation useful as a rhetorical or interpretive reference. Commemorative and civic education organizations marking the 250th anniversary of independence also benefit from the formal recognition.
Who is hurt
No group faces a direct, material negative effect from this bill. Some legal scholars may object that elevating the Declaration's status as an "Organic Law" could be used in future litigation to argue for interpretations of rights or sovereignty that go beyond what the Constitution's text currently supports — potentially creating uncertainty in areas such as immigration law, civil rights, or federal authority. Groups whose interests are not reflected in the Declaration's original 1776 text (e.g., those who note the document's historical exclusions) may object to a formal congressional re-adoption without qualification.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that the Declaration of Independence is already listed among the Organic Laws of the United States in the U.S. Code and that this reaffirmation simply makes Congress's recognition of that status explicit and solemn on the occasion of the nation's 250th anniversary. They contend that the Declaration's core principles — equality, unalienable rights, and government by consent — are the moral foundation upon which the Constitution was built, and that formally reaffirming them reinforces the continuity of American self-governance. The bill's unanimous Senate passage reflects broad, bipartisan agreement that these principles transcend political division.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that while the Declaration is a celebrated historical document, it has no operative legal force — courts have consistently held it does not create enforceable rights or override constitutional text — and that a congressional "re-adoption" may create confusion about its legal status. They contend that selectively reaffirming the Declaration without acknowledging its historical contradictions (including its authors' ownership of enslaved people and the exclusion of women and Indigenous peoples from its promises) presents an incomplete picture, and that the bill's findings, particularly Finding 10 regarding Americans as "one people," could be invoked to support restrictive interpretations of immigration or citizenship policy.