S-4838-119
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Sponsored by Steve Daines (R-MT)
What it does
This bill would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938 to add a new exemption from federal minimum wage and overtime pay requirements. The exemption would apply to employees who primarily provide outdoor recreational outfitting services — including equipment rentals — or guiding services, as long as their employer is also primarily in that same business. It would not affect state-level minimum wage or overtime laws.
Who benefits
Outdoor outfitting and guiding businesses — such as whitewater rafting companies, hunting and fishing guide services, ski rental shops, and wilderness tour operators — that would face lower mandatory labor costs. Small and seasonal outdoor recreation businesses that may struggle to meet federal wage floors during off-peak periods. Employers in rural and frontier states where the outdoor recreation industry is a significant part of the local economy. Indirectly, consumers who might see lower prices if reduced labor costs are passed through.
Who is hurt
Employees working as outdoor guides, outfitters, and equipment rental staff who would lose federal minimum wage and overtime protections, potentially earning less than $7.25/hour or receiving no overtime premium for hours worked beyond 40 per week. Workers in states without strong state-level wage laws would be most exposed, as the federal floor would no longer apply to them. Workers who rely on overtime pay during peak seasons — such as summer rafting or ski season — could see reduced compensation. Labor advocacy organizations that view FLSA protections as a baseline floor for all workers.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that outdoor guiding and outfitting is a highly seasonal, tip-supplemented industry where rigid federal wage and overtime rules create unsustainable cost structures for small operators. They contend that the FLSA already contains dozens of industry-specific exemptions — including for seasonal amusement parks, fishing operations, and small farms — recognizing that one-size-fits-all rules harm niche industries. They argue that guides often earn well above minimum wage through tips and performance-based pay, making the federal floor largely symbolic while the overtime mandate imposes real costs on businesses that must staff intensively during short peak windows.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that removing federal wage and overtime protections from an entire class of workers — regardless of their actual earnings — exposes low-wage employees to exploitation with no federal recourse. They contend that the FLSA's existing seasonal exemptions are narrowly drawn and that this bill's broad language ("primarily engaged") could cover a wide range of workers beyond elite guides, including low-paid equipment rental staff and support workers. They further argue that tipping is unreliable and uneven, and that workers in states without strong wage laws would have no meaningful protection if the federal floor is removed.