S-492-119
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Sponsored by Bill Cassidy (R-LA)
What it does
This bill would increase the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) rate from 40% to 50% of qualified first-year wages for employers who hire workers from targeted groups (such as veterans, long-term welfare recipients, and people with disabilities). It would add a second wage tier — up to $12,000 in wages — for employees who work at least 400 hours, effectively rewarding longer-term retention. It would also remove the current age cap (under 40) for SNAP (food stamp) recipients qualifying for the credit, making all SNAP recipients eligible regardless of age.
Who benefits
Employers — particularly in retail, hospitality, manufacturing, and other high-turnover industries — who hire from targeted groups and would receive larger tax credits. Veterans, especially those with service-connected disabilities or long-term unemployment, who would see significantly higher wage caps for the credit (up to $48,000 for certain disabled veterans). SNAP recipients over age 40 who were previously excluded and would now qualify employers for the credit. Long-term welfare (TANF) recipients whose employers would receive enhanced second-year credit rates. Workers in targeted groups broadly, who may see increased hiring demand if the credit successfully incentivizes employers. Tax professionals and payroll administrators who manage WOTC certifications.
Who is hurt
The federal Treasury, which would collect less revenue as employers claim larger credits — the fiscal cost would depend on uptake rates. Employers who do not hire from targeted groups and thus cannot access the credit, potentially facing a competitive disadvantage relative to those who can. Workers not in targeted groups who may face indirect competition for entry-level positions if employers preferentially hire WOTC-eligible workers. State workforce agencies, which process WOTC certifications and may face increased administrative workload without additional funding. Taxpayers broadly, to the extent the revenue loss is offset by spending reductions or other tax increases.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that the existing WOTC has a documented track record of connecting hard-to-employ workers — including veterans and long-term welfare recipients — with jobs, and that the current 40% credit rate has not kept pace with rising wages or inflation since the credit was last substantially updated. They contend that raising the credit to 50% and adding a retention tier for workers who reach 400 hours directly addresses a known weakness: employers have historically used WOTC as a short-term hiring incentive without retaining workers, and the new wage tier rewards sustained employment. Removing the age 40 cap for SNAP recipients, they argue, eliminates an arbitrary barrier that excludes millions of food-insecure adults over 40 who face significant labor market challenges.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that decades of research on hiring tax credits show mixed results — employers often claim credits for workers they would have hired anyway, meaning the credit subsidizes existing behavior rather than generating new employment for targeted groups. They contend that expanding the credit's generosity without addressing this "deadweight loss" problem simply increases the cost to the Treasury without proportionally increasing employment outcomes for disadvantaged workers. Critics also argue that the administrative complexity of WOTC certification — which requires state agency verification — already creates barriers for small businesses, and that increasing credit amounts without streamlining the process may primarily benefit large employers with dedicated HR staff, widening the gap between large and small business competitiveness.