S-578-119
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Sponsored by James Lankford (R-OK)
What it does
This bill would create a five-year pilot program within U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) establishing two new civilian positions — image technician 1 and image technician 2 — to review nonintrusive inspection (NII) images of vehicles and cargo at U.S. ports of entry. Image technician 1s would assess images for contraband, drugs, weapons, or unauthorized persons and refer suspicious items to CBP officers for further inspection. Image technician 2s would have additional duties, including sharing intelligence with the National Targeting Center about smuggling techniques. Both positions would operate out of five regional command centers, receive annual training on image analysis and civil liberties, and be supervised by CBP officers. The program would sunset after five years, with technicians eligible to transfer to comparable positions within CBP or DHS.
Who benefits
CBP officers, who would have more dedicated analytical support and could focus on physical inspections and enforcement. Travelers and commercial shippers at ports of entry, who may experience faster processing if image review is handled by dedicated staff. Domestic industries harmed by smuggled counterfeit goods, who could see improved interdiction. Communities affected by drug trafficking, if the program improves detection of illicit substances. The National Targeting Center and broader intelligence community, which would receive additional reporting on smuggling techniques. Civilian job seekers interested in federal law enforcement-adjacent careers.
Who is hurt
Smugglers and traffickers whose methods may be more systematically identified and reported. Taxpayers, who would bear the cost of establishing five regional command centers, staffing two new position types, and funding annual training programs. Existing CBP officers, who could face role ambiguity or jurisdictional friction with the new civilian positions. Privacy and civil liberties advocates concerned about expanded surveillance infrastructure at ports of entry, even if images are of vehicles and cargo rather than individuals.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that CBP is severely understaffed relative to the volume of vehicles and cargo crossing U.S. borders, and that dedicating trained civilian analysts to image review would free sworn officers for higher-level enforcement tasks. They contend that nonintrusive inspection technology is already deployed at ports of entry but is underutilized due to personnel constraints, and that a structured pilot with intelligence-sharing requirements would generate actionable data on evolving smuggling techniques — directly strengthening national security and drug interdiction efforts.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that creating a parallel civilian workforce to perform functions adjacent to sworn law enforcement could introduce accountability gaps, particularly if image technicians make consequential referral decisions without the full training and legal authority of CBP officers. They contend that a five-year pilot with five regional command centers represents a significant infrastructure commitment that may be difficult to unwind, and that the bill's privacy and civil liberties training requirements — while present — may be insufficient safeguards against mission creep in a surveillance-adjacent role.