S-861-119
Held at the desk.
Sponsored by Gary Peters (D-MI)
What it does
This bill would direct FEMA to develop and operate a single, consolidated intake system through which disaster survivors could apply for assistance from multiple federal disaster assistance agencies at once. The system would allow applicants to check application status, update their information throughout recovery, and receive information about additional available resources. FEMA would be required to update the consolidated application within 30 days of a request from a participating disaster assistance agency, and would be required to submit implementation reports to Congress, with the Government Accountability Office also producing an independent review.
Who benefits
Disaster survivors — including victims of hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and other declared disasters — who currently must navigate multiple separate application systems. Low-income and elderly survivors who may struggle most with complex multi-agency paperwork. People with limited English proficiency or disabilities who benefit from a single point of contact. State, local, and tribal emergency management partners who coordinate with federal agencies. Fraud investigators who would gain a consolidated data source to detect abuse. Taxpayers broadly, if administrative efficiency reduces overhead costs.
Who is hurt
Federal agency staff at FEMA and other disaster assistance agencies who would face transition costs and workflow changes during implementation. Contractors and vendors whose existing agency-specific application systems may be displaced. Applicants during any transition period if the new system experiences technical problems or delays. Privacy advocates concerned about consolidating sensitive personal data across agencies into a single system. Smaller or specialized disaster assistance programs whose unique eligibility criteria may be difficult to incorporate into a one-size-fits-all application.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that disaster survivors are among the most vulnerable people in the country and that forcing them to navigate a fragmented web of separate agency applications compounds their hardship at the worst possible moment. They contend that a unified intake system would reduce duplicative data entry, speed the delivery of aid, and make it easier to detect fraud and waste across programs — problems that GAO and FEMA's own inspector general have repeatedly documented in past disaster responses, including after Hurricanes Katrina and Maria.
Opponents argue
Opponents argue that consolidating multiple agencies' intake processes into a single system is technically complex and carries significant implementation risk — federal IT modernization projects have a well-documented history of cost overruns and failures, including the troubled Healthcare.gov rollout and multiple failed IRS modernization efforts. They contend that a one-size-fits-all application may not adequately capture the distinct eligibility requirements of different programs, potentially delaying or wrongly denying aid to survivors who would have been served more accurately by agency-specific processes.