SRES-192-119
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2710; text: CR S2718)
Sponsored by Edward Markey (D-MA)
What it does
This resolution designates April 30, 2025, as "National Assistive Technology Awareness Day." It commends assistive technology specialists, program coordinators, professional organizations, and researchers who help individuals with disabilities and older adults access assistive technology devices and services. The resolution does not create new law, appropriate funds, or impose any requirements on any person or entity.
Who benefits
People with disabilities (approximately 70 million Americans, per CDC data cited in the resolution) and older adults who use assistive technology may benefit from increased public awareness. Assistive technology specialists, program coordinators, and researchers receive formal recognition from the Senate. Professional organizations in the assistive technology field may gain visibility. Assistive technology manufacturers and vendors could benefit indirectly from heightened public awareness of their products.
Who is hurt
No group is directly or materially harmed by a commemorative resolution. There are no mandates, spending changes, or regulatory effects. Competing awareness designations for the same date could be marginally crowded out, though this is a negligible effect.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that assistive technology is a necessity — not a luxury — for the roughly 70 million Americans with disabilities and the 2 in 5 adults over 65 who have a disability, and that public awareness is a prerequisite for broader access and funding. They contend that formally recognizing the professionals and researchers in this field elevates a community that enables millions of people to participate in education, employment, and community life.
Opponents argue
Opponents might argue that a one-day symbolic designation does nothing to address the concrete barriers — cost, availability, and insurance coverage gaps — that prevent millions of people with disabilities from accessing assistive technology. They contend that congressional time and attention would be better directed toward substantive legislation, such as expanded funding for state assistive technology programs or stronger coverage mandates, rather than non-binding commemorative resolutions.