SRES-653-119
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1357; text: CR S1382)
Sponsored by Joni Ernst (R-IA)
What it does
This resolution designates March 21, 2026, as "National Women in Agriculture Day." It recognizes women's contributions to U.S. agriculture as producers, educators, leaders, and mentors, and encourages citizens to acknowledge those contributions. The resolution carries no legal mandates, appropriations, or regulatory changes.
Who benefits
Women working in agriculture — including the more than 1.2 million female agricultural producers, as well as women in agricultural research, education, agribusiness, sales, and advocacy — receive formal congressional recognition. Youth agricultural programs such as 4-H and the National FFA Organization are also acknowledged. Organizations that promote women's participation in agriculture may benefit from increased public visibility.
Who is hurt
No group is materially harmed by a commemorative resolution. There are no regulatory burdens, spending redirections, or legal obligations created.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that women represent more than one-third of U.S. agricultural producers and that farms operated by women accounted for $222 billion — 41 percent — of total U.S. agricultural sales in 2022, yet their contributions are often underrecognized. They contend that formal congressional recognition raises public awareness, encourages young women to enter a high-demand field, and aligns with the United Nations' designation of 2026 as the International Year of the Woman Farmer.
Opponents argue
Opponents might argue that a one-day symbolic designation, with no accompanying funding, policy changes, or enforcement mechanisms, does little to address structural barriers women face in agriculture — such as disparities in access to credit, land ownership, and USDA program participation documented in federal farm census data. They contend that congressional time and attention would be better directed toward substantive legislation addressing those documented gaps.