SRES-823-119
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4365; text: CR S4392)
Sponsored by Alex Padilla (D-CA)
What it does
This resolution designates the week of August 2 through August 8, 2026, as "National Farmers Market Week." It formally recognizes the role of farmers markets in supporting food access, local economies, healthy communities, and sustainable farming. The resolution does not create any new law, program, spending, or regulatory requirement.
Who benefits
Farmers market operators and vendors who receive national recognition. Direct-to-consumer farmers and food producers who may see increased public awareness and foot traffic. Agricultural advocacy organizations that use the designation for promotional purposes. Low-income consumers who use federal nutrition benefits at farmers markets, who may benefit from heightened public attention to that access point.
Who is hurt
No group faces a direct material harm from this resolution. Competing food retail channels (grocery chains, large distributors) receive no comparable recognition, though the resolution creates no legal disadvantage for them.
Supporters argue
Supporters argue that farmers markets generated $1.7 billion in farmer income in 2020 and grew from 1,755 to 8,771 locations between 1994 and 2019, demonstrating a significant and expanding sector worthy of national recognition. They contend that formal designation raises public awareness of farmers markets as sites of food access, community connection, and sustainable agriculture education — benefits that extend to low-income communities that rely on federal nutrition benefits redeemable at these markets.
Opponents argue
Opponents could argue that commemorative resolutions consume limited legislative floor time without producing enforceable policy outcomes, and that the underlying issues — food access for low-income Americans, support for small farmers, and sustainable agriculture — would be better addressed through substantive legislation such as funding for nutrition benefit programs or direct farm support. They contend that symbolic designations may substitute for, rather than complement, meaningful policy action on the challenges the resolution itself identifies.